ГДЗ по английскому языку 9 класс Ваулина, Дули, Подоляко, Эванс - ответ страница 115

### Упражнение 6 **Ответ:** 1. **One point in favour of** banning violent TV programmes is that viewers may begin to identify themselves with the aggressive characters. **Consequently**, they may become violent themselves. 2. **The main advantage of** young people travelling in groups at night is that they are a lot safer. **As a result**, fewer youngsters will become victims of street crime. 3. **Some people believe that** motorcycles should be banned from motorways because they are too dangerous. **In particular**, the number of deaths due to motorcycle accidents is extremely high. --- ### Упражнение 7 **Ответ:** * **Phrases used to express an opinion:** 1. *I am totally opposed to* (Я категорически против) 2. *I am very much in support of* (Я всецело поддерживаю) * **The writer’s opinion in Ex. 2 (p. 114):** The writer is opposed to the idea / in support of the topic, expressed using the phrase: *«In my opinion, I am totally opposed to...»* / *«I firmly believe that...»*. --- ### Упражнение 8 **Ответ:** * **Key words:** *school newspaper, essays discussing the arguments for and against, banning violent sports, 180–220 words*. * **What to write:** A for-and-against essay (эссе «за и против»). * **Style:** Formal style (официальный/академический стиль — без сокращений, с вводными конструкциями). * **Two sides of the argument:** 1. Arguments **for** banning violent sports (аргументы за запрет жестоких видов спорта: риск травм, рост агрессии, жестокость). 2. Arguments **against** banning violent sports (аргументы против запрета: улучшение экипировки, выход накопившейся агрессии, проверка силы духа). --- ### Упражнение 9 #### a) Сопоставление аргументов «за» и «против»: * **1 — c** (Риск травм или смерти $\leftrightarrow$ Стандарты безопасности можно улучшить) * **2 — a** (Делают людей агрессивнее $\leftrightarrow$ Это способ выплеснуть агрессию) * **3 — b** (Не соответствуют моральным нормам $\leftrightarrow$ Это состязание силы и воли) #### b) Сопоставление аргументов с пояснениями и примерами (Justifications/Examples): * **Arguments for (За запрет):** * **1 — vi** (*Many young boxers are seriously injured every year.*) * **2 — i** (*Aggressive behaviour learnt on-field carries over to conflicts outside the world of sport.*) * **3 — ii** (*They are barbaric and express the worst side of human nature.*) * **Arguments against (Против запрета):** * **a — iv** (*They are a healthy way to let off steam.*) * **b — iii** (*Testing yourself in this way is vital to a person's all-round development.*) * **c — v** (*More protective clothing can be used.*) --- ### Упражнение 10 **Пример эссе (For-and-Against Essay):** > **Should Violent Sports Be Banned?** > > Violent sports such as boxing and mixed martial arts have always been popular, but they also cause heated debates. While some people believe these sports should be banned, others argue that they play an important role in society. > > To begin with, opponents of violent sports argue that athletes risk serious injury or even death. For example, many young boxers are seriously injured every year. On the other hand, supporters claim that safety standards can easily be improved if more protective clothing and stricter medical checks are used. > > Secondly, some people believe that playing violent sports makes people more aggressive. They point out that aggressive behaviour learnt on the field often carries over into everyday life. In contrast, others maintain that such sports provide a controlled outlet for aggression, offering a healthy way to let off steam. > > Finally, critics claim that violent sports do not uphold moral standards because they are barbaric and express the worst side of human nature. However, fans see them purely as contests of strength and will, arguing that testing oneself is vital for personal development. > > In conclusion, there are strong arguments on both sides of the debate. In my opinion, I am totally opposed to a complete ban on violent sports, as long as proper safety regulations are strictly enforced. *(214 words)* --- ### Объяснение и правила 1. **Слова-связки (Ex. 6):** * Конструкция `One point in favour of / The main advantage of + [существительное / герундий] + is that...` грамматически требует подлежащего с предлогом, после которого идет сказуемое *is*. * `Consequently` и `As a result` выражают логическое следствие («следовательно», «в результате»). * `In particular` используется для перехода к конкретному примеру или уточняющей статистике. 2. **Структура эссе «За и против» (Ex. 8–10):** * **Paragraph 1 (Введение):** четко обозначает проблему в нейтральном тоне, без выражения личного мнения. * **Paragraphs 2–4 (Основная часть):** каждый абзац начинается с тематического предложения (*Topic sentence*), рассматривает одну сторону вопроса с подтверждением/примером (*for + justification*) и сразу противопоставляет ей контраргумент (*against + justification*). * **Paragraph 5 (Заключение):** подводит итог сказанному и содержит личное мнение автора с использованием вводных фраз (*In my opinion, I am totally opposed to... / I am very much in support of...*).